An automated system using machine learning methods, applied to a broad historical database, while avoiding survivorship bias, and for a variety of performance metrics, is developed and tested against actual historical human performance, for drafts, free agency, and trades, in the National Basketball Association (NBA). The resulting system is robust, comprehensive, realistic, and does not overfit information from the future. Backtested over ten years in a partial equilibrium non-zero-sum setting where only one team can benefit from its recommendations, the automated general manager would have outperformed the actual historical production of every single team, by substantial margins. From draft decisions alone, the average team lost about $130 million worth of on-court productivity relative to what they could have had with the automated general manager in total over the decade; this shortfall represents a quarter of the average franchise value. Thus, the general management of sports franchises may benefit substantially from automation.
Citation: Maymin, Philip Z. (2017), "The Automated General Manager: Can an Algorithmic System for Drafts, Trades, and Free Agency Outperform Human Front Offices?" Journal of Global Sport Management, 2:4, 234-249.
Presentations
- Cornell Financial Engineering Manhattan Seminar, April 11, 2018 video
Blogs and Discussions
- Marginal Revolution (31 comments)
- Wages of Wins (8 comments)
- Sports Analytics Blog
Media and Press
- Medium: The Cost Of Bad Drafting
- Wall St. Cheat Sheet: The 6 Best Drafting Teams in the NBA, And the High Cost of Poor Picks
- NYU Press Room: FRE Professors Take Two of Top Five SSRN Spots